Top 20 List Of Dr Fauci Deeds

Dr. Anthony Fauci’s actions and deeds many consider Dr. Frankenstein like, have sparked debate and varying opinions among different groups of people. Here’s a list of Dirty Deeds that many view as controversial, with opinions ranging from positive to negative to down right evil.

Top 20 List Of Dr Fauci Deeds

The Top 20 List Of Dr Fauci Deeds is a short list of the many ways Dr. Fauci has been on the wrong side of decency and history.

1. Inhumane Dr. Frankenstein Experiments: One of the most evil on the Top 20 List Of Dr Fauci Deeds and the one few people can ever forget, is the satanic experiments done on animals, especially the one where they tied Beagle puppies down and let sand fleas eat their faces off alive. To make it worse they cut the vocal chords of the poor puppies so they wouldn’t have to hear them scream in agony. Such an act is believed by many to be one of such evil, that it can never be explained away.
2. Advocating for Dangerous Public Health Measures: Dr. Fauci has been a vocal advocate for public health measures such as mask-wearing, social distancing, and vaccination to mitigate the spread of infectious diseases like COVID-19. Even when mask wearing was proven to be ineffective and also caused harm to people who wore them, especially children, he still pursued the action.
3. Guidance on COVID-19 Restrictions: Some people commend Dr. Fauci for providing guidance on implementing restrictions to control the spread of COVID-19, while others criticize him for what they perceive as overly restrictive measures. The whole scheme was proven to be harmful to health and economy.
4. Communication Style: Dr. Fauci’s communication style, characterized by phony caution and adherence to skeptical scientific evidence, has garnered praise from the left, while others find it overly controlling and went against common sense and visual observations.
5. Public Health Education Deception: He has played a significant role in the promotion of false information and deceptions to mislead the nation. His role was supposed to be about educating the public about infectious diseases and promoting public health awareness, but instead turned out to be manipulation of the data and causing great harm to the nation in political and health related issues.
6. Handling of the AIDS Epidemic: Dr. Fauci’s handling of the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s and 1990s has been criticized, with some describing his efforts in advancing research and treatment as the opposite, faulting him for the pace of progress and allocation of resources and benefiting financially from the project.
7. Involvement in Controversial Research: His involvement in controversial research areas such as gain-of-function studies has divided opinions, with some arguing that it is necessary for understanding and combating emerging infectious diseases, while others raise concerns about potential risks.
8. Response to Criticism: Dr. Fauci’s response to criticism and scrutiny, including accusations of misinformation or mismanagement, has been interpreted differently by various groups, with most viewing it as inappropriate and others as outright defensive or dismissive.
9. Advice on Travel Restrictions: His advice and recommendations regarding travel restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic have sparked debate, with some supporting stringent measures to prevent the spread of the virus and others criticizing them as excessive or ineffective. The world consensus is that you can’t hide from a virus. Unless you live your life in an airtight environment.
10. Collaboration with Industry: Dr. Fauci’s collaborations with pharmaceutical companies and other private-sector entities to develop treatments and vaccines have elicited mixed reactions, with some praising his efforts to accelerate medical advancements and others expressing concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Most people feel he was all about the money, not the advancement of science.
11. Media Presence: His frequent appearances in the media to provide updates and guidance on public health issues have been viewed positively by some as a source of reliable information, while others perceive it as contributing to overexposure or politicization. It turned out to be propaganda in general. The longer they kept the pandemic hoax going, the more money he made and the more control the Government obtained over the populations.
12. Stance on Lockdowns: Dr. Fauci’s stance on lockdowns and their effectiveness in controlling disease transmission has been a subject of debate, with some supporting their implementation as necessary measures to save lives and others criticizing them for their economic and social impact. Again, it turns out it was more about money and power.
13. Role in Government: His role as a government advisor and bureaucrat has led to differing opinions, with some valuing his expertise and experience in shaping public health policy, while others question the extent of his influence and accountability. He was not an elected official, yet he weaseled his money making endeavors into the mix.
14. Response to Early COVID-19 Outbreak: Opinions vary on Dr. Fauci’s response to the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, with some praising his efforts to raise awareness and mobilize resources, while others criticize perceived delays or missteps in the initial response.
15. Testimony to Congress: His testimonies to Congress regarding the government’s pandemic response and public health strategies have been scrutinized, with interpretations ranging from commendation for transparency to accusations of misleading or contradictory statements. He lied to Congress but never had to pay a price.
16. Engagement with Critics: Dr. Fauci’s engagement with critics and skeptics, including scientists, policymakers, and the general public, has been viewed differently, with some appreciating his willingness to address concerns and others criticizing perceived dismissiveness or defensiveness. He along with the democrat party and the MSM assassinated the character or validity of anyone who tried to expose their schemes.
17. International Collaboration: His advocacy for international collaboration and cooperation in addressing global health challenges has been praised by the left as essential for effectively combating infectious diseases on a global scale, while most question the efficacy of such efforts or express concerns about sovereignty and resource allocation.
18. Support for Science Education: Dr. Fauci’s support for science education and literacy initiatives has been lauded as important for fostering public understanding of complex health issues, but some criticize perceived biases or omissions in scientific messaging.
19. Representation of Scientific Community: His representation of the scientific community in the public sphere has been both praised and criticized, with some viewing him as an effective spokesperson for evidence-based medicine and others questioning his objectivity or perceived conflicts of interest. He supported the woke ideology as well over science based results.
20. Legacy in Public Health: Dr. Fauci’s overall legacy in public health, including his contributions to research, policy, and public awareness, is a subject of debate, with opinions ranging from admiration for his lifetime achievements to skepticism about his impact or effectiveness. Most feel that he used his position to garner support for personal gratification of money and influence.

Top 20 List Of Dr Fauci Deeds

Top 20 List Of Dr Fauci Deeds. These points illustrate the complexity of evaluating Dr. Fauci’s actions and decisions, which are subject to interpretation and influenced by individual perspectives, values, and priorities. It’s essential to consider a diverse range of opinions and evidence when assessing the implications of his work in public health and medical research.

Wake Up America, Before It’s Too Late !